It was only
when they came into power as coalition partners at the last election, that we
realised precisely how far we had come.
Finally, children had become used to studying for the English
Baccalaureate. After the judicial reviews had abated, it was only natural to
see social acceptance follow.
All it needed was a little time.
Last week, the
Education minister spoke out for all of us “The Government has a duty ensure
that before all else, the children of this land learn about Englishness”.
The
Englishisation reforms were entirely necessary, we were told, to strike back at
the heart of cultural and academic revisionism, and a growing intolerance of
the English. The billboards two elections ago echoed what every child now knew
by rote -
"The
English are no longer a minority in their own land. The fightback begins
here"
Without the education reforms a generation ago, it may well have been
that we would continue patiently down the wrong path. The problem with
multiculturalism was that it had given rise to fanaticism - a belief that all
peoples, of whatever race, religion or creed were entitled to a proportionate
slice of the pie. Clearly, in such an overcrowded land as ours, this could
never be the case. As in fact, history had proven time and time again. A
handful of Marxist journalists and now jailed politicians, had created a
climate where understanding and the accommodation of different backgrounds, had
become more important than remembering who we as a people once were.
A leading backbencher quipped during a Commons debate that "having a month dedicated to studying
the influence of Blacks - it's simply got nothing to do with us in
England". It was important to give children an understanding of how The Indian Mutiny had been an
uncharitable poke in the face of a benevolent presence by poorly educated Indian
hoards; it was equally beyond comprehension to think that once our children had
learned of Seacole rather than Thatcher.
Restrictions on foreign press reporting had been a natural consequence
of the great Press Reform Act which followed a series of inquiries and a decade
of debate. We had been shown evidence of 'scandalous misreporting' and 'media
manipulation' from foreign broadcasters and naturally, as both upholders and
arbiters of media virtue, the Government now had a responsibility to ensure the collective would not be corrupted
again; and so it was only "right and proper" as the Home Secretary
had said, that two licensed broadcasters be enough. In fairness, as we often
say to the children, if they don't like the cartoonomercials from the English
Broadcasting Company, they can watch America Global - choice as we have been
told, is quite rightly, distracting.
Arguably, the "Reinigungwoche" even today, and after all
these years, is still considered controversial in some quarters. History
teaches us that whenever those predicated to barbarism, incivility and unrest
increase in numbers, when a critical mass is reached, that public disorder
follows. The Reinigungwoche deaths, as sad and widespread as they were,
entirely needless had those people not resisted their facilitated relocation to
the Supermax residences. The minutemen had to do their jobs. As our historians
have subsequently recorded, as have our politicians showed their support. It
was important, as the PM said to "cleanse the palette" once in a
while.
Society is indebted to those brave activists and political social
leaders who worked tirelessly to awaken the English to the terror of Islamic
extremism. No longer shackled by the bureaucracy of long defunct and man-made
concepts of human rights and fiscal union, once European states were set free,
we too were able to press forward with long needed domestic national security
reforms. Secularism has been our saving grace. That we have a state Church
which does not interfere in our lives and has nothing but a ceremonial
presence, is as much of a compromise as we the people, will allow. For once, we
can recognise the work of the Secretary of State for Communities and Secular
Society in ensuring that religious extremists keep their views to themselves.
Advances in our understanding of the non-overlapping magisteria of the real
world and the spiritual realm, have enlightened society beyond all recognition.
Today, we realise that limiting our understanding of human rights has
been an economic disaster. The "Pathways to Success" program has
saved 72% of our welfare bill through effective management and was a key
component in the reducing the deficit - it's something a nationalised health
service could never have introduced. In fact, amongst my friends it's now
considered unusual to not take the state subsidy at age 60. Dignity and being
able to choose the time and place of one's passing is a fundamental human
right. Latest polls indicate that Population Management is the fastest growing
area of study for the Oxbridge-Ivy students.
For the record, my wife and I have already opted to take our state
subsidies together on her sixtieth birthday. We have booked a two week, all
inclusive, assisted-retreat in the Bahamas. It should be incredible.
No comments:
Post a Comment